Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her personal observations; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own personal observations? How are the observations made by you and your classmate the same or different?
- CheckPoint 2: Argument Credibility Peer Review
- Review the Constructive Feedback Tutorial at http://204.17.25.69/AXIA/CRT205/constructive_feedback.html. This tutorial utilizes audio narration and is about 10 minutes in length. A constructive feedback transcript is available.
- Perform a peer review of a classmate’s CheckPoint Part I response, which your instructor will place in your Individualforum on Day 3.
- Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response:
- Do you think your classmate accurately identified the claims? Explain your answer.
- Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her personal observations; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own personal observations? How are the observations made by you and your classmate the same or different?
- Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her background information; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own background information? How are the background analyses of you and your classmate the same or different?
- Do you think your classmate made an accurate judgment about the author’s bias or trustworthiness? Explain your answer.
- Which concepts from the feedback tutorial did you use to conduct this peer review?
- Post your answers and your classmate’s CheckPoint Part 1 online news source and response.