Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her personal observations; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own personal observations? How are the observations made by you and your classmate the same or different?

  1. CheckPoint 2: Argument Credibility Peer Review

 

  • Review the Constructive Feedback Tutorial at http://204.17.25.69/AXIA/CRT205/constructive_feedback.html. This tutorial utilizes audio narration and is about 10 minutes in length. A constructive feedback transcript is available.
  • Perform a peer review of a classmate’s CheckPoint Part I response, which your instructor will place in your Individualforum on Day 3.
  • Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response:
    • Do you think your classmate accurately identified the claims? Explain your answer.
    • Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her personal observations; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own personal observations? How are the observations made by you and your classmate the same or different?
    • Your classmate has compared the claims against his or her background information; how do the claims agree or conflict with your own background information? How are the background analyses of you and your classmate the same or different?
    • Do you think your classmate made an accurate judgment about the author’s bias or trustworthiness? Explain your answer.
    • Which concepts from the feedback tutorial did you use to conduct this peer review?
    • Post your answers and your classmate’s CheckPoint Part 1 online news source and response.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW