MGT300 Colorado State Soft Skills in Workplace Volunteering & Internships Essay

Critical Thinking Assignment (75 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Personality and Motivation—Analyze a Personality

Demonstrate your understanding of personality and motivation, and your critical thinking and writing skills, by synthesizing theories of personality and motivation as covered in your textbook readings this week. Include any theories you have discovered on your own personality and motivation research efforts. Base your response to this assignment on the personality of somebody with whom you have direct experience in the workplace—it could be a peer, a manager, a subordinate, or even yourself.

  1. Describe the person’s personality broadly (either as described by the “Big Five” model, or by the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from Chapter 9 of your textbook).
  2. Given what you know of the personality under examination, explain which theory, or theories, of motivation would be most effective for a manager to use when trying to help this individual achieve his or her full potential at work.
  3. Describe the process of determination, and the theory, or theories, you eventually recommend.
  4. Explain how the manager can use the tenets of that theory, or those theories, as applied to the person who serves as your case study.

Your well written paper should meet the following requirements:

Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which both help to bolster your own assertions, as well as supplement your ideas.

Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.)

Option #2: Soft Skills in Workplace Volunteering and Internships

After reading Hoy’s (2011) article regarding internships and volunteering and visiting the Student Career Center (Links to an external site.) to read the information about soft skills, identify an opportunity to volunteer or intern through your current workplace, through an organization connected to your field of study, or one found through the Student Career Center (Links to an external site.). Keep in mind that volunteering on a workplace committee, as an extension to the community or working under a mentor’s care, are all examples of volunteering or internship (to name a few). Once you have identified your workplace opportunity, choose four soft skills from the list and complete the following:

  • Analyze each of the four chosen soft skills in connection to what skill is important to your chosen volunteer or internship opportunity.
  • Examine each with specifics, details, and offer examples related to your field of study.
  • Conclude with a reflection of how your own soft skills could positively impact the chosen volunteer or internship experience.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content, analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing—which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics appropriately. Remember that you can always improve your work by providing support from outside scholarly sources, which help both to bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.

Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The

Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the

library that are designed to support this specific course. Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide

Required

Recommended

MGT300 Mod 2 CT

MGT300 Mod 2 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation

The paper demonstrates an understanding of personality, motivation, and theories of personality or the paper details soft skills needed in the workplace for volunteering and internships. The paper includes all of the required components as specified in the assignment, 3-4 pages in length, APA formatting, and scholarly sources.

12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation

The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation

The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

5.0 to >2.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources, and references key concepts with in-text citations to support answers.

2.0 to >1.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

1.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

1.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis into theories of personality and motivation or an analysis of four chosen soft skills in connection with a volunteer or internship opportunity.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the perspectives on the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome MGT3001 Describe the importance of managerial goals and objectives. view longer description

threshold: 3.0 pts

5.0 pts Meets Expectation- Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of theory; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

3.0 pts Approaches Expectation – Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

2.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

0.0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 75.0

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW